NoScream~SPARTA~ Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 5th and 6th generation SATA SSD drives A simplified look, for those still on HDD CHRISTMAS is coming (15 weeks) thinking of an upgrade part? £150 will get you a high end 120GB boot. OS boots quicker. 120GB+ boot drives, enough storage to hold OS & main day to day programs. Std Spindle HD's do around 120Mb/s transfer, even in RAID a HDD does not match a SSD. Six drives compared Main advantages: Speed Long service life (10-15yrs) no moving parts spin up time virtually zero constant data rates through the drive No sound/noise Low power Low heat light weight $200 / £149 128GB Crucial M4 2.5" Solid State Drive CT128M4SSD2 Micron MLC NAND 6Gbps SATA interface Up to 175Mbps write speed Sequential Read 415 MB/s Limited 3 year warranty http://www.cclonline.com/product/56562/CT128M4SSD2/Hard-Drives/128GB-Crucial-M4-2-5-Solid-State-Drive/HDD0532/ http://www.provantage.com/crucial-technology-memory-ct128m4ssd2~7CIAL6KU.htm Adata S511 Series 120GB Sequential Read 550 MB/s Sequential Write 510 MB/s Connectivity: 1 x SATA III - 6Gb/s Memory Type: MLC-Flash http://www.scan.co.uk/products/120gb-adata-s511-500-series-sata-iii-ssd?utm_source=google+shopping&utm_medium=google+shopping The one main thing that makes a big difference today is dumping a HDD & installing a SSD, if your on a HDD boot, think about it.... Time to switch.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MH6~SPARTA~ Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 Saw an ad for Newegg for a $50 60GB SSD. Not sure of the quality, but it was an OCZ so can't be but so bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter~SPARTA~ Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 Key is sata III 6 Gb, older sata 2 are not so good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batwing~SPARTA~ Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 (edited) So, at 42" into the first Video, it starts the stop watch. I still have to understand when the time Is taken to start. I was thinking the time should be taken since when you push the power botton, but obviously this is not the case, because you should see the POST screen and all the crap your MB is loading. My "lovely" ASUS has a couple of stand by during POST procedure, never understood why they made it like that. I can t do anything to speed up that. Here is looks like he is starting the stop watch right off the POST procedure, which is right because now is when the OS really starts the loading process. And, when is considered full loaded ? Win 7 gives to you a working OS right away, while secondary processes are loading "delayed". So when do Stop the time ? I will make a test this afternoon when I go back home, possibly I ll get a video too let s see what I come out with EDIT: On that video it looks like the winner is the SSD RAID Intel V25 which achieve the 2 small icons loaded in the lower right corner in about 16 secs I will take those 2 icons as Ending point because I can t see any other marker I can use to decide when this test ends. Edited August 26, 2011 by Batwing~SPARTA~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter~SPARTA~ Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 Here is something for you to play with http://www.soluto.com/ I have 1'35" start up time for my desktop and about 2'35" for my laptop with i5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skaz~SPARTA~ Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 i got 13 seconds on my g53 laptop i7 and 240 gb ssd. its priceless, you cant even go for a piss before it boots up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batwing~SPARTA~ Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 looking better at the first video I see there are 3 icons coming up, which slightly change the results. The SSD Raid intel V25 seems to take 18 seconds to get to the 3 Icons loaded - Skazbr, are you sure your system takes 13 seconds??? Then as HDD best performance the WD 500GB RAID (which bytheway I guess is a mistake, it should be 1 TB - 2 500GB disks in Raid 0 = 1TB available)perform up to the 3 icons in 38 secs My system is a RAID 0 500GB (2 x 250 WD) is loading in 48 secs up to the 3 icons So, I am not super happy about it, but I know the weak part of my system are the HDD. I am still not sold about SSDs. Their performances is obviously undeniable, but still too much expensive for my taste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoScream~SPARTA~ Posted August 27, 2011 Author Share Posted August 27, 2011 Here is something for you to play with http://www.soluto.com/ I have 1'35" start up time for my desktop and about 2'35" for my laptop with i5 Nice link, installed. Then as HDD best performance the WD 500GB RAID (which bytheway I guess is a mistake, it should be 1 TB - 2 500GB disks in Raid 0 = 1TB available)perform up to the 3 icons in 38 secs The 2x WD 500GB RAID is running RAID 0 stiping which should have the text 1TB (2x 500GB) a text error. Not mirror (RAID 1). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoScream~SPARTA~ Posted August 27, 2011 Author Share Posted August 27, 2011 Soluto runs .net 4 Looks Benign (harmless) opening up 4 port addresses for data update & reporting on boot. Installed, run. for boot up it analyses the time used by each background startup app and allows you to DELAY or PAUSE (Remove from bootup) there by improving boot times. My initial boot time was 1' 32" First boot after, time 1' 10" Second boot 1' 07" Winamp was 12 sec of delay... Bah... This app gets a thumbs up. Switch on to OS 45sec (BIOS), +66 seconds to full desktop From end of BIOS, start of OS load to Desktop finish = 66 sec. down from 92 seconds. BIOS LOAD = 45sec OS LOAD = 66sec APPS loading at BOOT = 75 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeno~SPARTA~ Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 I used this Soluto My Sata SSD PC has gone from 0:54 to 0:47 My PCIe SSD PC has gone from 1:08 to 0:26 Amusingly Soluto takes 1 second in the startup. Thanks Peter and Viii PS I dont really understand these numbers so I timed the boot manually From the physical startup (not reboot) 0:15 to BIOS 0:39 to Windows Startup 0:61 to windows ready for use How does this correspond to the soluto numbers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter~SPARTA~ Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 I'm having a hard time putting any faith into this Soluto. Perhaps its not suited for old HDD boot drives. I rebooted and got my first time, paused and delayed some 30+ apps, then rebooted again. My second time was 5 seconds slower than my first time. I dunno. - JHunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter~SPARTA~ Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 I like Soluto for 1 reason it let me manage what is booting without hassle of looking in to registry or searching for ways to disable unwanted software. I don't really care how long it take to boot my PC, im doing it only 1-2 times a day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batwing~SPARTA~ Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 I did not install this Soluto program. I am a little bit concerned with third party programs interfering with my stuff. If I want to check and kill useless stuff at start up I know how to do it. Besides that, Win 7 already optimize the system to delay secondary processes at start up. However I have about 65 processes running after boot, so, I don t know exactly which one are the priority ones, but I don t think there are too many to disable or delay to have a consistent improvement. Furthermore, I usually put my PC to Sleep and fully reboot sometimes twice per week, so... the all "Boot speed" is not exactly a primary concern to me. Above and beyond all of the possible benchmarks, we do know SSD is the best way to go. If you have a deep wallet or you are eligible for a gift (Birthday, Xmas, Anniversary, Dog Birthday...) just ask for the nice gift I think this is what I ll do for Xmas, simplifying my g/f search for the right gift. Otherwise, SSD is still really overpriced for what is does for a stream line, medium PC user. Using it for Bussiness is different Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skaz~SPARTA~ Posted August 29, 2011 Share Posted August 29, 2011 I used this Soluto My Sata SSD PC has gone from 0:54 to 0:47 My PCIe SSD PC has gone from 1:08 to 0:26 Amusingly Soluto takes 1 second in the startup. Thanks Peter and Viii PS I dont really understand these numbers so I timed the boot manually From the physical startup (not reboot) 0:15 to BIOS 0:39 to Windows Startup 0:61 to windows ready for use How does this correspond to the soluto numbers Do desktops usually take longer to boot than laptops? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter~SPARTA~ Posted August 29, 2011 Share Posted August 29, 2011 No, its up to PC configuration (cpu,HDD and how much programs you load at the start up). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeno~SPARTA~ Posted August 29, 2011 Share Posted August 29, 2011 Your machine must be the knee of the bee, 13 seconds is really fast for a full boot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoScream~SPARTA~ Posted October 15, 2011 Author Share Posted October 15, 2011 Another test another reason to dump the boot HDD & install a SSD @toms hardware a bias but in-depth test a SSD v HDD Samsung 128Gb SSD v 3GB Seagate barracuda October 2011 TOMS HARDWARE TESTS http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/ssd-upgrade-hdd-performance,review-32292.html Seagate Barracuda XT (3TB, SATA 6Gbps) 64Mb cache & 7,200 RPM The SSD is on SATA II 3Gbit port the Barracuda is on a SATA III 6 Gbit port, yet the SSD rapes the HDD even that it's on a 1/2 speed port. The SSD on a SATA III port would terminate the HDD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts