CoBoL~SPARTA~ Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 When did this come out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2S_K_IU2K0 Who I got in the top 20. Hall of fame might be last, My Results Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halli~SPARTA~ Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Came out end of last year but I still use 06 to compare my old scores. I plan on getting the Sandy Bridge platform when I do I'll post my Score with Advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batwing~SPARTA~ Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 (edited) So, Cobol, I am impressed! Do I read correct? U have a CF with 2 5970 (4 GPUS) ? and 12 GB RAM .. impressive machine! However that test scares the crap out of me. If your config is correct, nonetheless you scored an FPS average ranging between 65 and 70 on some tests while around 34 on others. All of this at a standard res of only 1024*600. I mean, what kind of machine you really need to run this test ? 1024*600 is not really a res we use anymore nowadays. Probably you were using a demo version of this test which does not allow res modification, but what happens if you run this test at 1920*1200 ??? I will try to download this test if is compatible with ATI series 4xxx just for fun, to test my CF config with my 2 4850s but... lol.. I am expecting an Epic failure.. lol. About the 3D Mark 06, I was used to use it as well, till when I noticed that those results are totally tied up to your CPU performances, which defeat the concept of a GPU benchmark. With 06 I recently made a test with a friend. He got a new 6850 which is supposed to be a quite performing card and he has an AMD quadcore. He scored something around 19k. My config with CF 2 4850s and CPU i7 920 OC @ 3.5 scored over 22k. Actually, with the new generation cards, I do not believe the 06 test makes any sense anymore. EDIT As I supposed this test requires DX 11 only hardware, so no joy for 4xxx series. However I noticed the minimal settings are 1280*720 (I guess..), an HD res 720p, wich is a respectable res. Weird tho on the report it says Cobol screen was set at 1024*600... Edited January 21, 2011 by Batwing~SPARTA~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoBoL~SPARTA~ Posted January 21, 2011 Author Share Posted January 21, 2011 There are three test modes, first being 1024x600 Entry, 1280x720 Performance, 1920x1080 Extreme. I only posted the Basic test has that seems to be the one every body is doing. When you see the result a Entry(Exxxxxxx), Performance(Pxxxxxx), Extreme(Xxxxxxxx), are the modes. Has for GFX cards I only have the one 5970 which is a dual GPU card, hence it saying 2 GFX cards. My Results :- Entry New One with a Little OC Performance No OC will do later Extreme No OC will do later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halli~SPARTA~ Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 Ok Don't laugh. http://3dmark.com/3dm11/587849 Detailed scores3DMark Score P3177 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Graphics score3626 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Physics Score2384 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Combined Score2223 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GraphicsTest1 16.2 FPS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GraphicsTest2 16.56 FPS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GraphicsTest3 22.19 FPS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GraphicsTest4 11.56 FPS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PhysicsTest 7.57 FPS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CombinedTest10.34 FPS Settings ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Feb 19th Ran again : raised NB volts to 1.5 and added two sticks of ram HyperX for 6gb total mem over clocked system 5% . 3336 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/682569 Intel Core 2 Quad Processor Q9505 Processor clock2974 MHz Physical / logical processors1 / 4 # of cores4 Graphics Card Graphics CardNVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 # of cards1 SLI / CrossFireOff Memory1024 MB Core clock607 MHz Memory clock1603 MHz Driver nameNVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 Driver version8.17.12.6658 Driver statusFM Approved General Operating system64-bit Windows 7 (6.1.7600) MotherboardASUSTeK Computer INC. StrikerExtreme Memory6144 MB Module 12048 MB Kingston 7 @ 400 MHz Module 22048 MB Kingston 7 @ 400 MHz Module 31024 MB OCZ 7 @ 400 MHz Module 41024 MB OCZ 7 @ 400 MHz Detailed scores 3DMark ScoreP3336 Graphics score3634 Physics Score2806 Combined Score2507 GraphicsTest1 16.23 FPS GraphicsTest2 16.58 FPS GraphicsTest3 22.24 FPS GraphicsTest4 11.6 FPS PhysicsTest 8.91 FPS CombinedTest 11.66 FPS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GySgt~SPARTA~ Posted February 5, 2011 Share Posted February 5, 2011 @Halli better then my score ;/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batwing~SPARTA~ Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 And here are my scores with my brand new 6950: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/676781 All in all, i m quite proud of these scores, getting somewhat close to Cobol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halli~SPARTA~ Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Nice Batwing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slain~SPARTA~ Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Just ran it on my new rig. P8647 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/677851 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batwing~SPARTA~ Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Wow Slain, that rocks !! I m glad about that because that was my future project. Later on I will go for a 6950 CF config, and this shows how powerful that config is. Congrats on your new rig man ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EBE Posted February 21, 2011 Share Posted February 21, 2011 (edited) basic 1200/900 RES. on normal got 2921 (Voltage 1.000 = 800 core /1600 shader/2000 memory) little tweak got 3244 (Voltage 1.050 = 900/ 1800/ 2100) (crashes)to bad (Voltage 1.075 =950 /1900 / 2200 (testing (still) in game(s) worx .. ) still TESTING .... greetz ;-) any advice ..? know what i need better motha_ board and RAM hahha as always.. Edited February 21, 2011 by EBE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewman~SPARTA~ Posted February 21, 2011 Share Posted February 21, 2011 Halli / Ebe I am with you P3525 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/693978 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewman~SPARTA~ Posted February 21, 2011 Share Posted February 21, 2011 (edited) So I pushed the GPU a little harder P3690 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/694076 I then pushed the GPU hard to 775 core clock and 1100 memory P3743 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/694278 Edited February 21, 2011 by andrewman~SPARTA~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halli~SPARTA~ Posted February 21, 2011 Share Posted February 21, 2011 Well my system would not stay stable at 5% over so I had to reset back to nilla.............. but at least the MB handles the Q9505 which is better than an E6850 I just feel like some games play better at 3gb or over but it could just be in my mind. Andrewman that's a decent jump just pushing the Gpu! (watch the heat) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batwing~SPARTA~ Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 Alright, I just modded my 6950 to be a 6970 and it is working very well. Here you can see the Shaders main difference, however you can notice also many other values quite different from stock version, also due to a solid OC: 950 / 1450 actually at max load temp of 80 celsius which is really very good. and here is my new 3Dmark 11 result: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/703152 Note the benchmark still sees a 9650 but is running as a 6970 323 pts increase is quite a good margin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewman~SPARTA~ Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 OC'd to 3.9 and managed an extra 14 points P3757 Bah, I think I will take Connor's GFX card and crossfire them to see what difference that will make http://3dmark.com/3dm11/749820 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightspeed~SPARTA~ Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 i think this 3d mark stuff is a load of shit myself - if you can run the games you want to run with graphics on a high setting and you dont see low fps causing laggy screens then your system is fine. points really don't mean shit and prolly make a lot of ppl buy new stuff just bcoz they think they are missing out. i have lost count of the number of graphics cards i have bought expecting something new and amazing compared to the last and there just wasn't that much difference. even a bottlenecking cpu does not seem to be the huge bottleneck after you replace the cpu. its all BS - marketing to make you buy more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halli~SPARTA~ Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Yep right but it's fun to test our systems. Crysis is the real benchmark if you can play it your doing fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaiSan Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Definately time for a CPU upgrade soon P3975 3DMarks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts