Gon5~SPARTA~ Posted May 22, 2015 Share Posted May 22, 2015 http://www.livescience.com/33673-tree-rings-sound-record-player.html?cmpid=514636_20150522_46089086&adbid=z12ujzsrmxvrxdxuq23hjlf5zoq3gfgzl04&adbpl=gp&adbpr=101164570444913213957 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cylawyer~SPARTA~ Posted May 23, 2015 Share Posted May 23, 2015 Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gon5~SPARTA~ Posted May 29, 2015 Author Share Posted May 29, 2015 why what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cylawyer~SPARTA~ Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 The point is? I don't get the point of trying to interpret a sound from a growth ring that has nothing to do with sound. While slightly interesting, I find it to have been a colossal waste of time and ANY money that may have went into it! Might as well piss on a cross in a jar and ask for someone to finance it. Thus the why? (nothing to do with your having posted it, more a why did they waste the effort doing this) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gon5~SPARTA~ Posted May 29, 2015 Author Share Posted May 29, 2015 (edited) you see now days people want to waste their time reinventing stuff that nobody look at it with interest; Instead of making a great discovery they tend to look for less productive but more stupid shit to come around. Just like a car that runs on fossil fuel they add more plastic and less metal but it still runs and operates on fossil fuels. Instead on finding a better more sophisticated way to do it they relied in the same shit discovered many decades ago. Now you want a good Invention check this out: http://www.bloomenergy.com/ Edited May 29, 2015 by Gon5~SPARTA~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cylawyer~SPARTA~ Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 I would say this: This report was in 2010 what happened to it since then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts